Legal Opinion

Fox Motor Co. v. Dillard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 17, 1950No. 32755PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWorrill, J.

The sole question presented by this record is whether the provision for “liquidated damages” as set forth in the contract sued upon is in reality a provision for a penalty or is in fact a mere provision for liquidated damages. “Damages are given as compensation for the injury sustained. If the parties agree, in their contract, what the damages for a breach shall be, they are said to be liquidated, and unless the agreement violates some, principle of law, the parties are bound thereby.” Code, § 20-1402. In Martin v. Lott, 144 Ga. 660-664 (87 S. E. 902), Justice Beck, speaking for the Supreme…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goodman v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
  2. Sanders & Ables v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Martin v. LottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Allison v. DunwodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  5. Mayor of Washington v. Potomac Engineering & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clark v. MeylandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API