Legal Opinion

Horner v. Horner

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 1980No. 7912DC488PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

*336Defendant’s Appeal

Defendant assigns as error the admission of certain testimony which she contends showed the court allowed her to be examined as to her adultery. When the defendant was being cross-examined, plaintiffs counsel asked her if she had committed adultery. The court sustained as objection to this question. Later in the cross-examination, the defendant was examined as follows:

“Q. Did you permit your uncle to touch you?

A. Yes, I did.

Q. Where did you let him touch you?

Mr. Deese: OBJECTION.

Court: OVERRULED.

Q. Where would you let him touch you?

A. He would put his arms around…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rogers v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Traywick v. TraywickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Earles v. EarlesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Phillips v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vandiver v. VandiverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Roberts v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API