Legal Opinion

Graham v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 21, 1980No. 59432PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Chief Judge.

1. "Clearly, justice requires that a person found guilty after trial by jury should not be freed because the appellate court is prohibited from considering the entirety of the evidence.” Bethay v. State, 235 Ga. 371, 374 (219 SE2d 743) (1975). On the trial of a defendant charged with violation of Code § 99-9904 (fraudulent obtention of public assistance) the defendant made and the court overruled a motion for acquittal at the close of the state’s evidence. In her defense Ms. Graham took the stand and admitted that she had received public assistance during weeks when she had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bethay v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  2. Cotton v. John W. Eshelman & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Smith v. Bank of the SouthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  2. Johnson v. U.S. Textiles Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Robertson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API