Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 31, 2006No. 23124-1-IIIPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

128 P.3d 98 (2006)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Dione Jamaal WILLIAMS, Appellant.

No. 23124-1-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel One.

January 31, 2006.

David N. Gasch, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

Kevin M. Korsmo, Andrew J. Metts, Attorneys at Law, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.

SWEENEY, J.

¶ 1 Conspiracy is an inchoate crime. And so our focus is on "the conspiratorial agreement, not the specific criminal object or objects." State v. Bobic, 140 Wash.2d 250, 265, 996 P.2d 610 (2000). Here, a group of friends including Dione J. Williams planned to "do a lick."…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of FrancisWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. KnightWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. KnightWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. WaltersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. In re Pers. Restraint of SchorrWashington Supreme Court · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API