Legal Opinion
Kim v. Denning
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided September 16, 1998No. Civ.A. CV98-S-01517-SPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SMITH, District Judge.
This action is before the court on the motion of respondent Robert Denning to modify an arbitration award made May 7, 1997. Denning requests that this court modify the award, and thereby hold respondents jointly and severally liable for the amount of the award. In opposition, respondent Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. (“Dean Witter”) argues, inter alia, that Denning’s motion is untimely. The court agrees and must, therefore, deny Denning’s motion.
The Federal Arbitration Act, under which Denning seeks relief, states in section 12 that, “[njotice of a motion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scott v. Prudential Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Alan A. Booth, Counter-Defendant v. Hume Publishing, Inc., and the Hume Group, Inc., Counter-ClaimantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- David Brown and Rita Brown v. Rauscher Pierce Refsnes, Inc., and William H. BrashearsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Ernest E. Sargent v. Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc., Ndba as Painewebber IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Thomas P. Cullen v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.