Legal Opinion

Berbig v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 26, 2007No. 1—07—0072PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice South

This matter comes before us on the petition of defendants Sears Roebuck & Co. and Electrolux Home Products for leave to appeal, pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 306(a)(2) (166 Ill. 2d R. 306(a)(2)), the trial court’s order that denied their motion to dismiss based upon interstate forum non conveniens. We granted the petition on February 5, 2007.

Plaintiff, Zachery Berbig, filed this product liability cause of action in the circuit court of Cook County for injuries he allegedly sustained on July 13, 2004, while using a Craftsman GT 5000 Riding Lawnmower, which he purchased at a Sears retail store…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Dawdy, Jr. v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Vinson v. AllstateIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Peile v. Skelgas, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Brummett v. Wepfer Marine, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vivas v. Boeing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. Quaid v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Wagner v. Eagle Food Centers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. Hale v. OdmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  5. Quaid v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API