Legal Opinion
Love v. Judge of Recorder's Court of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided November 4, 1901PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Mandamus by Charles E. Love, assistant corporation counsel of the city of Detroit, to compel James Phelan, judge of the recorder’s court of said city, to entertain a complaint for the violation of a city ordinance.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This is a proceeding to compel the respondent to entertain a prosecution against one William Allen.
There is an ordinance in the city of Detroit the material portions of which read as follows:
“An ordinance to regulate the use of public streets, avenues, parks, grounds, and other public places in the city of Detroit.
“It is hereby Ordained by the People of the City of Detroit:
“Section 1. No person shall, in or upon any of the public streets, avenues, parks, grounds, or other public places within the one-half mile circle from the city hall, *546make any public address, beat drums, blow horns, or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Brooklyn Park Commissioners v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Davis v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Giozza v. TiernanSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Doyle v. . AtwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Melconian v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Frend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- State v. SugarmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Coughlin v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.