Legal Opinion

United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Akers

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1986No. 16089PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The threshold issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in excluding evidence bearing on the subject of respondent’s residence. Appellant contends that the excluded evidence was critical to a fair determination of the availability of coverage under a policy of insurance issued to respondent’s husband, Richard Bryner. We conclude that appellant was prejudiced by the trial court’s ruling, thus mandating reversal of the judgment and a new trial.

Respondent, Sheryl Akers, was injured in a single car accident. Akers was a passenger in an automobile operated by Melanie Tholke when the…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, New Jersey v. BurchTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co. v. Federated American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. United Services Automobile Association v. MioneColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. American SEC. Ins. Co. v. Van HooseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hager v. American West InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1989
  2. Estate LoMastro Ex Rel. LoMastro v. American Family Insurance GroupNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Arlitz v. GEICO Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
  4. Assi v. TuckerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API