Polar Enterprises, Inc. v. Srednicki
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
In this case, the court had once set aside a default that permitted delinquent defendants to plead. Thereafter, the plaintiff sought an amendment to his complaint. In permitting the amendment because of prior confusion about pleadings, the trial judge directed (by court order) the defendants to file an answer by a day certain. This the defendants declined to do and, after the time for filing had expired, the plaintiff moved for a default based upon the defendants’ failure to comply with the court order. The judge entered the default. At no time did the defendants tender an answer to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Farish v. Lum's, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Ortiz v. NicolaidesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Rubenstein v. Richard Fidlin Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Jordan v. John Ryan Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Synthetic Environmental Development Corp. v. SussmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bonded Rental Agency, Inc. v. ConnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Continental Southeast Land Corp. v. RaymondDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Ungar v. Petro Gas Industrienlagen GMBH & Co. Betriebs KG MunichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989