Hudson v. State

OPINION

ROBERTSON, Justice.

After a jury found appellant guilty of burglary of a habitation, the court assessed punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, at confinement for 35 years. On appeal, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, the court’s charge to the jury, and the definition of the term “reasonable doubt” given by the judge, the prosecutor, and defense counsel. We affirm.

In his first point of error, appellant contends the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction because the evidence fails to show beyond a reasonable doubt…