Splater v. Thermal Ease Hydronic Systems, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Michael J. Corrigan, Judge.
{¶ 1} The issue in this appeal is whether the court abused its discretion by denying plaintiff Durand Splater’s motion to compel the production of certain trade secrets held by nonparty Noveon, Inc. Splater sought by subpoena Noveon’s formulae for certain antioxidants used by manufacturers of polyethylene (“PEX”) tubing. Noveon resisted the subpoena on the grounds that its formulae were trade secrets. In rejecting Splater’s guarantee of confidentiality, Noveon pointed out that one of the named defendants in Splater’s action was a direct competitor, who, as a party…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Daggett v. GessamanOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Arnold v. American National Red CrossOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Alpha Benefits Agency, Inc. v. King Insurance Agency, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
- Martin v. the Budd CompanyOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- McMillan v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1974