Eileen Hernandez, M.D. v. Lualhati Crespo

I write to respond to Justice Canady’s dissent criticizing what he perceives to be inconsistencies between the approach to whether there is a current medical malpractice crisis in the majority’s opinion in this case and our opinion in Estate of McCall v. United States, 134 So.3d 894 (Fla. 2014), as well as my concurring in result opinion in McCall.13 The majority opinion in .this case is based on this Court’s reasoning in Franks v. Bowers, 116 So.3d 1240 (Fla. 2013), which held a similar arbitration agreement void as against public policy. Just like in this case, Justice Cana-dy dissented in…