Legal Opinion

Haichell v. Board of Drainage Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 19, 1921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Hickman Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*247Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Hurt

Affirming.

This appeal involves the effect upon and the applicability of the provisions of snb-section 49a of section 2380; Vol. 3, Ky. Stats., to a drainage district which has been established and organized in accordance with the provisions of chapter 64, Session Acts, 1918, and which is now section 2380b, sub-sections 1 to 61, inclusive, of Vol. 3, Ky. Stats. Sub-section 49a, supra, is as follows:

“Discontinuance of Ditches. If at any time a majority in number and amount of those assessed for the maintenance of any public ditch shad petition the county…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Littell v. Board of SupervisorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Little v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Sim v. RosholtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Munson v. BlakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. City of Newport v. SilvaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Muffett v. Black, Drainage Com'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  2. Holt, Drainage Com'r v. Madison Coal Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Porter v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API