Legal Opinion

General S. S. Corp. v. Astoria Overseas Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1924No. 4068PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge

(after stating tbe facts as above). Appellant has dwelt upon the contention that the pledge of the unpaid subscriptions made by the board of directors of the Overseas Corporation in •July, 1921, was wholly void, upon the ground that, discretionary power being vested in the directors to make calls, and no authority appearing to have been given by the charter or Oregon statutes to do- so, the corporation had no power to pledge or assign the unpaid and uncalled for subscriptions, and that the stockholders by appearance in this litigation could not ratify the act of the directors, at least to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Hatch v. DanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Wood v. McCainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  4. Eppright v. NickersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. Bell v. BlessingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McDermott v. Bear Film Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. In re Free Gold Mining & Milling Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API