Legal Opinion
John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Frazer
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 31, 1941No. 28969PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
Thomas Eoss Frazer recovered in an action on an insurance policy covering permanent total disability which had. been issued by the John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company. The policy provided that if the insured, before having attained the age of sixty, has become “wholly disabled by bodily injuries or disease, and will be permanently, continuously, and wholly prevented thereby for life from engaging in any occupation or employment for wage or profit, the company will waive further payment of premium as to such insured and pay in full settlement of all obligations to him under this policy…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. SouthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- United States Casualty Co. v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. DowdleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Duhaime v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. FrazerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- INA Life Insurance Co. of New York v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- State v. RheinlanderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007