Lindsay v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Error to the Circuit Court of Montgomery. Tried before-the Hon. John D. Phelan.
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
The charge in the indictment in this easels, that the defendant sold “ to one Henry,, a slave, the property of one Maria Herron, a certain commodity, to-wit, one gallon of whiskey, without the consent of the master, owner or overseer of said slave, either verbally or in writing, expressing the article-permitted -to be sold, being first had and obtained.”
The defendant contends that the indictment is not good, because it was framed under the act of 1841-, which was repealed by the act, “the more effectually to suppress the evil practice-of trading with slaves,” passed in 1850. We think that the…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Gilmore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Bartley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
- Tomlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Anthony v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.