Legal Opinion

Pritchard v. Bigger

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1939No. Docket No. 40, Calendar No. 40,226PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a hard case, but it should not be permitted to make bad law. I am constrained to hold that defendant's motion for directed verdict was properly granted by the court below.

I agree that the sole question to be determined is whether Mrs. Bigger pledged defendant's credit to plaintiff in order to secure for herself the necessaries of life. Since the spouses were not residing together at the time, the presumption that the wife was authorized to pledge her husband's credit cannot obtain. People v. Kellogg, 205 Mich. 482. The rule is also laid down in Williston, Contracts (Rev. Ed.), § 270,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. CoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Connerat v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  3. Taylor v. SheltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  4. People v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. H. Leonard & Sons v. StoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. North Ottawa Community Hospital v. KieftMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Kerner v. Eastern Dispensary & Casualty HospitalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API