Legal Opinion
Robert E. Wilson, III v. Daniel Valente Dantas
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 6, 2017No. 62Published
1Opinion of the Court
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 62 Robert E. Wilson, III, Respondent, v. Daniel Valente Dantas, et al. Appellants, et al., Defendants. Philip C. Korologos, for appellants. Terrance Reed, for respondent. MEMORANDUM: The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. Defendants have expressly abandoned their personal jurisdiction claims in their appeal to this…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- EBC I, Inc. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.