Legal Opinion

Al-Haj v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 6, 1996No. 429-96PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON THE APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant pled guilty to the offense of delivery of a controlled substance and punishment was assessed at six years confinement. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Al-Haj v. State, 916 S.W.2d 660 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1996). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals correctly addressed appellant’s second point of error. After careful review of the appellate record, Court of Appeals’ opinion, as well as the briefs and oral argument…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Al Haj v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  2. State v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2008
  3. Campbell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  4. State v. Marshall Scott Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2008
  5. State v. Marshall Scott Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API