Legal Opinion

Orcutt v. Northern Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 13, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Stearns county, Searle, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after a dismissal ordered at the trial, in an action to-recover $2,000 for personal injuries.

1Opinion of the Court

Gilfillan, C. J.1

The plaintiff delivered to defendant, at the Minnesota Transfer, a car in which was his horse, some furniture, and. other property, to be transported by defendant over its line to Sauk Eapids, under a written contract in which were these stipulations: “The said shipper agrees to load, unload, and reload all stock at his-own expense and risk,' and to feed, water, and attend, the same at his'own expense and risk, while it is in the stock-yards of said company awaiting shipment, and while on the ears, and at feeding or trans- ■ fer points, or where the same may be unloaded for…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pacific Coast Co. v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
  2. Kloppenburg v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Leasum v. Green Bay & Western RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. ThurlowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API