Legal Opinion

Krummack v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1915No. 18283PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: P. James Cosgrave, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

Action to recover for the negligent killing of a child. Plaintiff recovered a judgment for the sum of $2,500, and defendant appeals.

The accident occurred in the switching-yards of defendant in the city of Lincoln. The petition charges that for many years there had been situated on T street, immediately east of Ninth street, a public school building, usually attended during the school year by from 300 to 400 children; that a playground equipped with amusement apparatus was maintained upon the school grounds; that the deceased, a boy of the age of seven years, was amusing himself at the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. GrablinNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. WymoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Shults v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. WilgusNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Wanderholm v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilfong v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Gubalke Ex Rel. Gubalke v. Estate of AnthesNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Boardman v. McNeffNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Mitchell v. Missouri Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Gubalke Ex Rel. Gubalke v. Estate of AnthesNebraska Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API