Legal Opinion

Schweyer v. Jones

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1908No. Docket No. 44PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne; Brooke, J. Assumpsit by John Schweyer and Rudolph T. Kienle, copartners as John Schweyer & Co., against Louisa L. Jones for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Plaintiffs, by their agent, sold to E. E. Jones, husband of the defendant herein, a bill of liquors. Plaintiffs sued E. E. Jones in justice’s court, took judgment, filed a transcript in the circuit court, and, after an execution was returned unsatisfied, filed a judgment creditor’s bill. Later E. E. Jones filed a petition in bank*243ruptcy and plaintiffs made due proof of claim in those proceedings. Afterwards plaintiffs commenced suit in justice’s court against the defendant, which case was appealed, after judgment, to the circuit court, where a verdict and judgment were rendered against her.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coldwater National Bank v. BuggieMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Old Ben Coal Co. v. Universal Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Timmerman v. BultmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Austin v. Socony Vacuum Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Ranta v. Newport Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. McGilvray v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API