Legal Opinion
State v. Orlando
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 13, 1932PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The defendant was found guilty of an indecent assault upon a young girl ten years old. The appeal contains thirty assignments of error, but we shall deal only with those pursued in the defendant’s brief.
The defendant made a motion in arrest of judgment but, with one exception, the grounds stated were errors in the charge dr rulings of the trial court or the insufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction; none of these grounds are proper matters for a motion in arrest but should be raised by an appeal from the judgment or a motion to set the verdict aside. Bishop v. Copp, 96 Conn. 571,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. SebastianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- State v. KinneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
- People v. DelaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- State v. DowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Bishop v. CoppSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. StankowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. ManningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.