Legal Opinion

Polytinsky v. Wilson

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1926No. 8 Div. 505Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

The obligation or mortgage, the basis of this suit, became due by election of the mortgagee on May 7, 1920. On that day the statute of limitation as fixed by Acts 1915, p. 142, began to run in favor of this defendant. On the 21st of May, 1920, suit was filed by this plaintiff against defendant, claiming certain personal property named in the mortgage. On the trial of the case, August 24,1925, plaintiff was allowed to amend his complaint by adding a count for the conversion of the property named in the original count and covered by the mortgage. To this added count defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mobile Light & Railroad Co. v. PortissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Wilson v. RatcliffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Dallas Manufacturing Co. v. TownesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API