Legal Opinion

Woentz v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to amend complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Siclen, J.

Motion by plaintiff for leave to amend complaint by adding thereto an alleged second cause of action setting forth the same statement of facts as alleged in the first cause of action for negligence, but alleging nuisance. Defendant’s corporation counsel opposes the motion and contends that said alleged second cause of action is merely a repetition of the first cause of action based on negligence, to which it has interposed a separate defense that the same is barred by the expiration of the time required for the filing of claim and notice of intention to commence an action under the provisions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Winter v. . City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Butler v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Brehm v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Hayes v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stanford v. LinenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API