Hamburger v. Bank of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Dingeman (Harry J.), J. Assumpsit by Anna Hamburger against the Bank of Detroit for the amount of certain deposits. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, C. J.
It is the claim of plaintiff in this case that one Fred A. Engel, her son-in-law, was conducting a small electrical contracting business in Detroit and that it was contemplated that a corporation should be organized to take over such business, plaintiff Engel and plaintiff’s nephew, an attorney, Leon H. Hamburger, to be the stockholders. The corporation was to be named Fred A. Engel Company, that being the name under which he was doing business. It is her claim that Engel was then largely indebted to her. It was contemplated that she was to put into the corporation approximately $2,000. Leon…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davis v. Lenawee County Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Rossello v. TrellaMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. Eastern Michigan MotorbusesMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- National City Bank v. Harbin Electric Joint-Stock Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Nurrie v. FitzgeraldMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Fisher-New Center Co. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Fisher-New Center Co. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.