Collier v. Idley's Executors
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
The Surrogate.
This will was proved before the Surrogate of Mew-York, July 8, 1848, and allegations were filed within the year, against its validity and the compe*95tency of its proof, by one of the next of kin of the deceased. (2 B. S., 3d ed., p. 122, § 23.) These allegations are sufficiently broad and comprehensive, to contest the will and its probate on every material point.
A citation having issued to the executors and legatees, to appear and “ show cause why the probate of the will should not be revokedit is now my duty at the time appointed, “ to proceed to hear the proofs of the parties.”…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Benoist v. MurrinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
- In re the Probate of a Paper Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of ZimmermanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1918
- In Re Proving the Last Will & Testament of KellumNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- In re the Probate of a Paper Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of ParkerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1917
- In re SouleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1888
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.