Legal Opinion

Santiago Irizarry v. Maldonado Aponte

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided December 23, 2003No. CIV. 01-2177(SEC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CASELLAS, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dockets ## 34, 36), Plaintiffs’ opposition (Docket # 43), and Defendants’ reply (Docket # 47). Upon careful review of the parties’ arguments, and the applicable law, Defendants’ motion for Summary Judgement will be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

Standard of Review

Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b) provides that: “A party against whom a claim ... is asserted ... may, at any time, move with or without supporting affidavits for a summary judgment in the party’s favor as to all or any part [of the claims…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cruz v. Puerto Rico-Dept. of JusticeDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007
  2. Jorge v. Galarza-SotoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API