Jackson ex dem. Goodrich v. Ogden
New York Supreme Court
THIS was an action of ejectment for land, in the town of Walton, in the county of Delaware. The cause was .ried at the Delaware circuit, on the 24th May, 1808, before . J1 7 Ml*. Justice Tates. The declaration contained eleven de- . . . mises.
Read the full summary
THIS was an action of ejectment for land, in the town of Walton, in the county of Delaware. The cause was .ried at the Delaware circuit, on the 24th May, 1808, before . J1 7 Ml*. Justice Tates. The declaration contained eleven de- . . . mises. A title was deduced to some of the lessors of the plaintifF to lots No. 15 and 16. in a tract of land originally surve37ed for Feter Van Brugh Livingston, and others, lying between the west branch of the Delaware-, and the Susquehannah river; and the only question at the trial was how the lots were to be located. The plaintiff produced m evidence a…
1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.
The lessors of the plaintiff having, on the trial, deduced a title, in Some of them, to lots No. 15 and 16. in a tract of land originally surveyed for Peter Van Brugh Livingston, and others, lying between the Coquaga branch of the Delaware river, and the Susquehannah river, in the town of Walton, in the county of Delaware, it became the sole question on the trial, how these two lots should be located. On the map of partition between the original purchasers, made prior to the issuing of the patents, it appears that lots No. 15 and 16. adjoin each other, and the, patent for lot No. 15. refers…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Jackson ex dem. Erwin v. MooreNew York Supreme Court · 1827
- Daggett v. WilleySupreme Court of Florida · 1855
- Dobbs v. KelloggWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Mutual Life Insurance v. CoreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Burton v. LazellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1844
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.