S. K. S. Holding Co. v. Vans Agnew
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
In an action on promissory notes brought against the executrix of an accommodation endorser by one to whom the notes were transferred after their maturity, the court directed a verdict for defendant at the close of the plaintiff’s testimony, and judgment was rendered for the defendant. A motion for new trial was denied and plaintiff took writ of error.
There was1 evidence of a consideration passing to the maker, and of tke signature of the endorser; and also evidence from which delivery of the notes to the payee after the endorsement of the defendant’s testator could have been inferred as…
2Cited by1 opinion
- City of Hialeah v. GrovesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939