Legal Opinion

S. K. S. Holding Co. v. Vans Agnew

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 28, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In an action on promissory notes brought against the executrix of an accommodation endorser by one to whom the notes were transferred after their maturity, the court directed a verdict for defendant at the close of the plaintiff’s testimony, and judgment was rendered for the defendant. A motion for new trial was denied and plaintiff took writ of error.

There was1 evidence of a consideration passing to the maker, and of tke signature of the endorser; and also evidence from which delivery of the notes to the payee after the endorsement of the defendant’s testator could have been inferred as…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Hialeah v. GrovesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API