Legal Opinion

Jason Lund v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 17, 2019No. 16-2381PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrow, District Judge.

Petitioner Jason Lund appeals the denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . The district court concluded that Lund's motion was untimely under each of the potential statutes of limitations and that Lund could not invoke the actual innocence exception to the statute of limitations because his claim of actual innocence was based on a case that interpreted the substantive law of his conviction: Burrage v. United States , 571 U.S. 204 , 134 S.Ct. 881 , 187 L.Ed.2d 715 (2014). Lund challenges only this…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Brazier v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025
  2. Brown v. WardenDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
  3. Cal v. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  4. Carlisle v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  5. Charlie D. Pryor v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API