Legal Opinion

Haggard v. Sanglin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1912No. 10115PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Prigmore, J., entered June 10, 1911, in favor of the plaintiff, upon stipulated facts, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

The question presented in this case is whether the six-year statute of limitations has run against seven promissory notes sued upon. The trial court held that the statute had not run, and entered a judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed.

The facts are stipulated. It appears that, on July 14, 1902, the defendant executed' and delivered to W. W. Wheaton thirty promissory notes, each for the sum of $50, the first note maturing one month after date, the next two *152months after date, and so on until the last, which matured thirty months after date. On the same day, the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hall v. JamesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Gunby v. IngramWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Coman v. PetersWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holcomb v. WebleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API