Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Vessel Bay Ridge
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
INTRODUCTION
Alyeska Pipeline Service Company (“Alyeska”) appeals the district court’s *383grant of relief on The Vessel BAY RIDGE (“BAY RIDGE”) motion to vacate arrest and to dismiss complaint.** The BAY RIDGE cross-appeals from the district court’s conclusion that Alyeska’s claim against the vessel gave rise to a valid maritime lien. The district court concluded the maritime lien was valid but the arrest of the BAY RIDGE pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. C (Supplemental Rules for Admiralty and Maritime Claims) (“Rule C”), violated the due process clause of the fifth amendment of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- The Brig Ann, McLain, MasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
- The Rio GrandeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Madden v. Lykes Bros.-Ripley Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Goncalves Ex Rel. Goncalves v. Rady Children's Hospital San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Cactus Pipe & Supply Co. v. M/V MontmartreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Farwest Steel Corp. v. Barge Sea-Span 241Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- James Goodman, D/B/A Captain J's Marina v. 1973 26 Foot Trojan Vessel, Arkansas Registration No. Ar1439sn Frank BoothCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Republic Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.