Legal Opinion

Sneed v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 27, 1973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DWYER, Judge.

The appeal from a conviction of burglary in the third degree and resulting punishment of confinement for not more than three years contains the following assignments of error filed by court appointed counsel.

The evidence does not support the verdict; the testimony of accomplices is not corroborated; the tools were not identified; the description of the tools stolen was not sufficient; the search and uncover of the tools from defendant’s automobile trunk was illegal; the trial court erred in not reducing a portion of his charge to writing; his constitutional rights were…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brooks v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Robinson v. NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Stubbs v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Poe v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Bratton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. PittsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1977
  2. Bates v. BatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. State of Tennessee v. Antonio BensonTennessee Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API