Legal Opinion

Amott, Baker & Co. v. Bing

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaul S. Streit, J.

This is a motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The theory of the action is that defendants employed plaintiff, a broker in the employ of the prospective purchaser, to obtain an acceptance of an offer by defendants to sell stock in a corporation, and that defendants thereafter refused to consummate the transaction, although plaintiff procured a purchaser, ready, able, and willing to buy the stock on defendants’ terms, within the period fixed in defendants’ offer. Plaintiff sues for the commission it alleges it would have received from the prospective purchaser but for…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Broadstone Realty Corp. v. EvansDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  2. Donald Zucker Co. v. Prime Properties, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  3. Poritzky v. GraffAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1980
  4. Prime Funding, Inc. v. DemetriadesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API