Legal Opinion
Benz v. Heckman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 30, 1938No. Appeal, 19PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Steen,
Plaintiff, in February, 1935, brought suit to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained in a beauty parlor during the course of a treatment given her by defendant Florence Y. Heckman. The statement of claim averred that the beauty shop was owned and operated by a partnership consisting of Florence Y. Heckman and her husband Oswald Heckman, and suit was accordingly brought against them individually and as copartners. No affidavit of defense was filed. The case came on for trial in September, 1937. Counsel for plaintiff offered in evidence the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mitchell v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Swain v. Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
- Ohlweiler v. OhlweilerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Manning v. BaylinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Gillespie v. Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bonker v. Bonker, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County1947
- Hershey v. Hershey, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1943
- Williams EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1966