Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Weir

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 15, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

. Appeal from a judgment of the justice of the Seventh District Court in favor of the plaintiff for $50 damages, besides costs. The recovery was for the value of a bicycle intrusted to the defendant as a common carrier.

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, P. J.

The plaintiff, a professional nurse, purchased a bicycle for $50 and delivered it to defendant’s express company, in Brooklyn to be shipped tó. Sussex, Hew Brunswick, Canada, at the same time signing and delivering 'to the company at its *531request duplicate papers to enable the company to get.the machine through the Canadian Custom House. ' This was on June I, 1896. The bicycle was never delivered in Sussex, the company having mislaid the duplicate paper sent with the machine. Upon the plaintiffs arrival in Sussex, a week after the shipment, she made inquiries of the express company’s agent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Connecticut & Passumpsic Rivers RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  2. Sherman v. . Hudson River Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Scovill v. . GriffithNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  4. Sturgess v. . BissellNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. American Express Co. v. BaldwinIllinois Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. King v. SherwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Jessup v. PlattAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912
  3. Jessup v. PlattAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API