Dingus v. Third Street Grocery
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion
OPINION DENYING MOTIONS FOR REHEARING
This matter comes before us on Claimant’s Motion for Rehearing and a pleading by the New Mexico Workers’ Compensation Administration (WCA) entitled “Motion for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae and for Rehearing.” We deny both motions for rehearing.
I. CLAIMANT’S MOTION
Claimant contends that we erred in holding that her award of an increased compensation rate was barred by the statute of limitations. Some of Claimant’s arguments in support of her contention were raised in her original answer brief and addressed in our opinion filed on March 21, 1994. We…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Green v. BiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Lawson v. Suwannee Fruit & Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Saiz Ex Rel. Estate of Saiz v. Belen School DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- City and County of Denver v. Denver Tramway CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.