State v. Judge of the Parish Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana
This case comes before the court on an application for a mandamus, commanding the parish judge, to appoint a curator adhoc, to certain absentees, who are made defendants in a suit, pending in this court. The record shows, that William De Forest Holly and others, non-residents and foreigners, obtained a judgment against Eugene Ory, in the Parish Court for (he parish and city of New-Orleans.
Read the full summary
This case comes before the court on an application for a mandamus, commanding the parish judge, to appoint a curator adhoc, to certain absentees, who are made defendants in a suit, pending in this court. The record shows, that William De Forest Holly and others, non-residents and foreigners, obtained a judgment against Eugene Ory, in the Parish Court for (he parish and city of New-Orleans. Ory, believing this judgment to be unjust, illegal and null, instituted his action of nullity against dhe plaintiffs therein, in the same, court, to annul and set it aside. The plaintiffs in that judgment,…
1Opinion of the CourtSimon, J.
A rule having been taken on the judge of the Parish Court, to show cause why a mandamus should not issue, commanding him to appoint a curator ad hoc, to defend Wm. De Forest Holly et al., in a suit instituted against them by Eugene Qry, and pending in his court, he showed for cause : 1st. That the rule has been taken at his suggestion, in order to obtain the opinion of this court upon a point of legal practice on which a great deal of doubt and difference of opinion seem to exist. 2d. That the suit instituted by Eugene Ory, has for its object to obtain the nullity of a judgment rendered in…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Succession of GuilleminSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847