State v. Howe
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Justice.
The defendant, Carl Howe, was convicted by a Maricopa County jury of receiving stolen property, a felony, Sec. 43-115, A.C.A.1939 and he appeals from the judgment and sentence thereafter imposed by the court. The record discloses that at the close of the State’s case the defense moved to dismiss the information on the ground that the State had wholly failed to prove venue and hence the court was without jurisdiction of the purported crime. The defendant’s sole assignment of error is predicated upon the trial court’s denial of this motion. It is the law that:
“In so far as venue…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- B.W.L. Sam v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
- Rain v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1913
- McColloch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
- Evinger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BrierlyArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. PhillipsArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. DetrichArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. WeisArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. ScottArizona Supreme Court · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.