Legal Opinion

Kip v. . Merwin

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1873PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

If the premises were rendered wholly untenantable by the fire, the defendants were entitled to a verdict, notwithstanding that the building was not destroyed, but only partially damaged. This is the plain meaning of the covenant contained in the lease. The court submitted to the jury the question whether or not the premises were rendered wholly untenantable by the fire, and no objection was made by the plaintiffs to such submission. It was not claimed at the trial that the evidence was not sufficient to warrant the submission of that question to the jury, nor was any exception taken to the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Old Line Co. v. Getty Square Department Store, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1971
  2. Acme Ground Rent Co. v. WernerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Reischmann v. L. N. Hartog Candy Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
  4. Weinberg v. SavitzkyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905
  5. American Bicycle Co. v. HoytWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API