Cruz v. Cruz

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

This action commenced upon plaintiffs’ complaint seeking restitution of premises, met by defendant’s counterclaim seeking restitution for funds and the value of labor expended for improvements made on plaintiff’s property under the mistaken belief that defendant, individually or jointly with her husband, owned the subject property. The counterclaim further asserted that defendant’s mistake *191could not have been discovered with due diligence, was reasonable under the circumstances, and that, although plaintiffs had notice of her mistake and the work being done, did…