Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2000No. 990253PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

{1 Pursuant to rule 41 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit certified the following question to us for decision:

Under Utah law, may plaintiffs who have entered into a judicially approved settlement with multiple defendants after a trial in which a jury allocated 100% of fault among the parties pursuant to the Utah comparative fault scheme, Utah Code Ann. §§ 78-27-37 to -48, [1] maintain a subsequent tort action for the same injuries, arising out of the same transaction or occurrence, against additional known…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re West Side Property AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Richardson v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Grewal v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. In Re West Side Property AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API