Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Beeland Wholesale Co. v. Kaufman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 18, 1937No. 3 Div. 198Published

1ConcurrenceAnderson, Chief Justice

(specially concurring).

The last amendatory Act 1936, Ex.Sess., p. 228, provides: “That in the event the Supreme Court of the United States shall hold the Federal ‘Social Security Act’ approved by the President August 14th, 1935, unconstitutional or inoperative for any reason whatsoever, then this Act shall become void, inoperative and of no effect.”

It is evident that the state does not wish to embark in the “social security” business except in co-operation with the federal government. It is also manifest that the life of the Alabama act is dependent on what the United States Supreme Court may…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Crumpton v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Eliasberg Bros. Mercantile Co. v. GrimesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Robertson v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API