Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 13, 1964No. 22418PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mobley, Justice.

1. The general grounds and the first special ground, which alleges that the testimony of an accomplice of the defendant was not corroborated, will be considered together, as this ground is only an elaboration of the general grounds. The testimony of the accomplice was corroborated, and the evidence was fully ample to support the verdict.

Pace, a co-indictee, testified that he, Stone, and Jackson conspired to rob the deceased, and that Pace and Stone went to the store to effect the robbery, while Jackson remained in the car, which they parked across the railroad tracks directly…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Eberhart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  2. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Gore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. Ingram v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  5. Montos v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  3. Britten v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  4. Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  5. State v. McKinneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API