Legal Opinion

State v. . Linney

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1938PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The appellants contest the validity of the trial and judgment below on three grounds.

1. They assign as error the denial of tbeir motion in arrest of judgment on tbe ground that the minute docket failed to show the selection of the grand jury in the manner prescribed by the statute. However, the record before us shows the organization of the court, the names of the jurors summoned for the term, the names of the foreman and seventeen other grand jurors drawn therefrom, “then and there impaneled, sworn, and charged,” as such, and that during the term the grand jury duly returned into open court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. . BittingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. State v. . DonnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. State v. . GilchristSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. State v. . MosesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1830
  5. State v. . MyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. StreetonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. State v. . DilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. . AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API