Legal Opinion

Berk v. Berk

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 22, 1973No. 72-753Published

1Per curiam

By this interlocutory appeal, the appellant seeks review of an order denying a motion for garnishment after judgment and granting a motion to quash same.

The appellant has not favored us with the original judgment, the motion for garnishment or the motion to quash. Therefore, we have no alternative but to affirm the action of the trial judge here under review. Best v. Barnette, Fla.App.1961, 130 So.2d 90; Santona-Nervia Corporation v. Publix Market, Inc., Fla.App.1962, 146 So.2d 394; Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. King, Fla.App.1968, 207 So.2d 294; Jones v. First National Bank in Fort…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. KingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  2. Best v. BarnetteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Jones v. First National Bank in Fort LauderdaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Santona-Nervia Corp. v. Publix Market, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API