Legal Opinion
Jimi Development Corp. v. Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribe
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided June 24, 1996No. Civil Action 95-D-2678PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Defendants Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribe and Ute Mountain Gaming Commission move to dismiss this action pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant Judy Knight-Frank moves separately to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Her arguments track those of the Ute Tribe. I will refer to the defendants collectively as the Ute Tribe. The motion is fully briefed and heard. For the reasons set forth in this order I grant defendants’ motions to dismiss.
I
Plaintiffs Jimi Development Corporation,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. National Assn. of Railroad PassengersSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ordinance 59 Ass'n v. United States Department of the Interior SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Village of Union SpringsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004
- Hartman v. Kickapoo Tribe Gaming CommissionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Shannon v. Houlton Band of Maliseet IndiansDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1999
- Ordinance 59 Association v. United States Department Of The Interior SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.