Legal Opinion
Pace v. Schwartz
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 20, 2010No. 08 Civ. 10996(JSR)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Stephen and Palmina Pace brought this action against defendant George Schwartz, alleging wrongful conduct on Schwartz’s part in handling a number of paintings by Stephen Pace that had been consigned to him for exhibition and sale. By Order dated April 13, 2009, the Court granted in part and denied in part Schwartz’s motion to dismiss all claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), leaving intact plaintiffs’ second, fourth, fifth, and sixth causes of action, for, respectively, breach of contract, replevin, injunctive relief, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Faiveley Transport Malmo AB v. Wabtec Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-aAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- United States v. NektalovDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Smith v. ConwayNew York Supreme Court · 1950
- Kerr Steamship Co. v. Kerr Navigation Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chiste v. Hotels.com L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- LCM XXII Ltd. v. Serta Simmons Bedding, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022