Legal Opinion
State v. Joseph
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided May 16, 2003No. 2003-K-315PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
847 So.2d 1196 (2003)
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Andrew J. JOSEPH, Jr.
No. 2003-K-315.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
May 16, 2003.
2Per curiam
Granted. A defendant's failure to specify which pre-trial rulings he desires to reserve for appeal as part of a guilty plea entered pursuant to State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584 (La.1976), may limit the scope of appellate review but should not preclude review altogether. See Crosby, 338 So.2d at 586 ("If we are not able to afford the accused their bargained-for appellate review, we must set aside the guilty pleas .... because of the non-performance of the plea bargain (or the…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- State v. SingletonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
4Cited by50 opinions
- State v. BossLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- State v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
- State v. RamseyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- State v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- State v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.